Monday, November 19, 2018

Fair Shot


I think this book is a very honest attempt to explain why guaranteed income is needed specially now.
Some of the reasons why it is in the news is because of the looming threat of Artificial Intelligence which
is going to change the nature of economy but keeping that aside there are strong enough reasons to consider it.  Even though employment numbers tell a different story (less unemployment) -  the number of people living paycheck to paycheck, doing more than one job with no benefits - has increased. The benchmark of “employment numbers” no longer fully reflects the reality.

The author Chris Hughes’ Facebook co-founder has been humble enough to admit that “he got lucky”. His working class parents did just enough to provide him with opportunities (education) and he ended up at Harvard where he happened to choose Mark Zuckerberg as his roommate - what if he hadn’t?. It then turned out that they created Facebook and he ended up with half-a-billion dollars even before he had turned 30.


From his life story you get that working class vibe which is totally true.
He seems to have done a lot of introspection how he ended up in the 1% of the population and so young and it seems to have had a profound effect on him.

He makes a very passionate case for Guaranteed Income.
Everyone seems to have their own definition/interpretation of Guaranteed Income. It is sometimes called as Universal Basic Income i.e for all the people. I was a little surprised by his manifest for Guaranteed Income (note - he doesn’t call it UBI) but he does make a strong case for it with solid numbers and study as evidence. He calls for every working age adult making less than $50,000 a year to be given a $500 month which would be paid for by the top 1%  - total budget for it would be $290 billion i.e less than half of the US defense budget or the Social Security system. In Chapter-9 he also points out that there are some ridiculous tax loopholes which if plugged can provide funding for such a system. Like, Warren Buffett pays less tax than his assistant cause if you earn more than $250,000 a year - your capital gains tax rate is less and if you inherit some property or a mansion - you do not pay tax on it. Popular loophole for the ultra-rich.

This gives a very reasonable estimate for the programme and also answers a popular criticism of who’s going to fund it.

Also, there’s a common tendency to label the recipients of such a benefit as lazy or few other derogatory terms - but I find it appalling and the author also points out that such efforts in the past have been invasive - asking extremely personal and uncomfortable questions to females.
A relevant reading would be “Regulating the poor”.

I also got the sense in Chapter-8 about how extremely difficult it is to get such a bill (or as a matter of fact any bill) passed in both the Houses. Everyone has their own views, understanding of the subject and are eager to leave their own stamp on the bill - which leads to concessions, negotiations, stalemates and a few times it all works out.

I was a bit confused about why guaranteed income implementation is needed when there’s an Income Tax credit (EITC). There’s a chapter about it but I’m not fully clear yet.
I don’t say it often but this book has a very sincere moving “Afterword”!

To summarize I agree that The natural drift of capitalism toward inequality requires a constant vigilance to make the market for everyone, not just for the rich. And such a system is needed.

P.S -
It was remarkable to note that MLK was in favor of such an idea but was assassinated before he could start a movement for it. Alaska already has a similar prototype, Permanent Fund out of which all Alaskans are on an average paid $1400 a year and it has relatively less inequality.







No comments: