You must hate the sin, not the sinner.
Many people have recommended lowering of age for all crimes/keeping
different juvenile age for different crimes.
We cannot simply suggest to lower the age if
We cannot simply suggest to lower the age if
·
India has less no. of
juvenile homes and less staff for it.
·
Juveniles form gangs
inside the reform homes. Boys are severely beaten inside and several have
claimed to have been sodomized by other inmates
(If we are so concerned about juveniles, why send them in the company of
hardened criminals? Do they not have same or even graver danger in their
company?)
·
On many occasions, the
minors bribe the security guards to obtain drugs
(Are adults or security guards in adult prisons averse to taking bribes? )
The police are supposed to
destroy the records of the juvenile after the completion of his/her sentence,
and so juveniles can easily get away without a criminal record (This is
the idea behind juvenile homes. To give a chance to the juvenile to reform and
be able to start afresh as he has a long life ahead of him.)
The whole practice of juvenile homes started to give offenders of a lower age
to have a chance to reform as most of them are naive and supposedly not mature
enough to distinguish good from bad. Also, many are from unprivileged
backgrounds. Juvenile homes are supposed to act as a rehab center for these
juveniles and help them understand their duty towards the society. Just because
ideal scenario does not exist, we should not be doing away this "golden
chance" for the minor offenders.
Also, India is a signatory to the UN conventions and we have before us the
juvenile age followed by different countries world over. Lets give some weight
to the convention. Afterall, it was arrived at after enough deliberations by
the experts having a much broader vision than us. Anyday, I will trust their
wisdom more than the media-whipped frenzy.
No comments:
Post a Comment